Ask a room of ten-year-old girls, who enjoys maths? And plenty of hands go up. Ask a room of sixteen-year-olds the same question, and something has shifted. The hands are fewer, the enthusiasm quieter. That drift away from science, technology, engineering and maths is one of the more stubborn patterns in education, and it is worth sitting with the uncomfortable truth behind it: the problem is rarely ability.
What the research keeps telling us
Study after study points to the same thing. Girls perform just as well as boys in STEM subjects at primary level and often better. The gap that opens later is not about talent. It is about confidence, perception, and the quiet signals children absorb about who belongs where.
Those signals come from everywhere. The toys marketed to each gender. The adults who assume a boy will take to coding more naturally. The textbook examples that feature male engineers and male physicists as a matter of habit. None of it is malicious, and most of it is invisible to the people passing it on. That is precisely what makes it hard to shift.
Confidence is a teachable thing
Here is the part that gives real cause for optimism. Confidence in STEM is not fixed at birth, and it is not lost for good at fourteen. It is built, and it can be rebuilt.
Girls who are encouraged to make mistakes, to tinker, to treat a wrong answer as information rather than failure, tend to hold onto their interest far longer. The environment matters enormously. A classroom where a girl can put her hand up without worrying about being the only one, where female role models are present rather than theoretical, changes the maths entirely.
This is why single-sex settings have drawn such attention in recent years. When there is no assumption about who the “science kids” are, girls fill every role by default. Someone has to run the experiment, debug the program, and build the model, and it turns out they are all more than capable. Schools that take this seriously, including a girls’ school that puts curiosity at the centre of learning, often find that interest in STEM holds steady right through the years when it usually begins to fade.
It is not about pushing; it is about permission
There is a temptation to treat all this as a recruitment drive, as though the goal is to funnel more girls into engineering regardless of what they actually want. That misses the point.
The aim is simpler and more honest: to make sure no girl quietly rules out a subject she might have loved because somewhere along the way she decided it was not for her. Some will go on to study physics. Some will choose history or languages or art, and that is a good outcome too. What matters is that the choice is genuinely open.
Small changes, lasting effect
The schools getting this right rarely rely on grand gestures. They do the ordinary things well. They invite women working in science and technology to speak. They make sure the images on the wall reflect the pupils in the room. They praise effort and problem-solving rather than innate cleverness, which research consistently links to greater resilience in girls.
They also resist the urge to make STEM feel like a worthy chore. A girl who has spent an afternoon building a circuit that actually lights up, or coding a game her friends want to play, does not need a lecture on why science matters. She has already felt it.
The girls who should be doing STEM subjects, then, are simply the ones who are curious, and that is most of them. The task for the adults around them is to keep that door propped open long enough for them to walk through it on their own terms. More about this approach can be found at https://butehouse.co.uk.
—
*This article was contributed by the team at Bute House School, an independent preparatory school for girls in Hammersmith, West London. Bute House is known for nurturing confidence, curiosity and academic breadth, preparing pupils for a wide range of senior schools and encouraging every girl to pursue her interests without limits.*
Tutoring Works Best When It Starts at the Right Moment
Photo courtesy of Flickr
Leave a Reply